The Italians struggled with this same question, but in a different context. As the older population dwindles and the young begin to move into places of economic power, dialects are being lost. To help keep their culture intact, while still allowing the children opportunities within the global arena, Italians now offer at least two types of required language: the regional dialect, and a foreign language - most likely English.
Alaska- take example. If you leave the families to make the choice, you will lose either way, as your future citizens must decide between academic illiteracy, or cultural ignorance. By making traditional culture a part of required education at all Alaskan state schools, you win both ways, and pull the past into the future.
more information, check out the NYT article on Alaska schools here: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/26/us/26alaska.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&hp
Thanks for bringing this up, Elyn. These systems are so complex, yet there must be a solution. Deciding between academic illiteracy and cultural ignorance isn't a choice that anyone should have to make, yet when governments are running on a tight budget and citizens are demanding cutbacks, how can schools increase their curriculum, especially when their student body is dwindling? This seems like an opportunity for community engagement. Local cultures are often best understood by elders who have more time on their hands than parents and teachers. Could this be an example of making the best of community assets?
ReplyDelete